
A wannabe asked on a forum, "r gud writers born or cn u learn it?" I gritted my teeth, shortened my "every piece of writing is an opportunity to forge good writing habits" speech, and thought about the question. Nature or nurture? The short answer is "both", especially for nonfiction, qualified for fiction. If you are born with high verbal skills (as measured by I.Q. and proficiency tests), highly sensitive and aware of your surroundings, and with a good memory, I suspect you could become a good nonfiction writer with ease. You might even be a natural story teller with imagination to produce decent fiction. It helps if you're born into a milieu that values reading, story telling, and the world outside your clan. Lacking these natal accidents, I think you can learn to develop the verbal aspects of your intelligence, deliberately sensitize yourself to notice changes, details, and to capture and recall them from memory. No matter how many notes I take in writing and/or tape record, there's always more in my mind about a conversation, person, place than I can capture at the moment. [
writing]
Listen to this article
1 Comments:
My answer:
"Just like most things, writing happens in steps. Before someone can put into words the story that is in their heads, whether it is there on its own or shaped via a class, one must understand the language in which the story will be written. That happens through experience, personal growth, education and practice. This is not to say that a four year old who can't write yet couldn't come up with a story. She would put it into the language she has at that time. So unless you plan on writing a book in internet/cellular shorthand, STOP WRITING IN IT."
Ah, that felt better. Can you tell that perhaps I dislike that type of written speech? My suspiciously dyslexic mind can't wrap around it. And I especially don't tolerate it in a writing environment, where my mind is set into that mode.
Post a Comment
<< Home