Writing Blogs Wrong or Right
Joe Wallace, over at The Freelance Zone, recently wrote about Writing Blogs: Why We’re Missing the Boat. It's an interesting article that highlights several active websites with Web 2.0 features such as forums, chat rooms and instant messaging services. These are all great communication modules that do indeed foster community and almost instant connectivity. Joe said:What is the number one rule about building a successful blog? The most important thing a blog needs is a growing community. Blogging is not just one person’s voice, it’s a collection of voices.And here I digress to disagree. This is Joe's definition of a blog, illustrated by the websites he chose to write about. When Internet logging began, it was in the form of text messages (there was no Web). A visitor dialed into a site and read messages. Then bulletin board service (BBS) evolved, and visitors could "talk back" by leaving a text message that others could read -- not unlike current forums. When email became a possibility, special interest groups formed that enabled someone to send a message to all members at once. Conversations carry on in that method to this day.
But the offshoot blogs began on the Web as a platform for one voice (or a small collective in the case of the first group blogs). When commenting ability arose, we all rejoiced. We could know if our words moved anyone else. Well, maybe they do, but only a small fraction of a blog's readers motivate themselves to expend the energy and brain power to comment. Often the comments come from people who are trying to lure readers to their blogs.
I've considered adding more interactive features like a chat or forum, and rejected pleas for instant messaging (I can't keep up with my email!) But other than a little chat box in a side column for occasional interchanges, adding those features would require an immense amount of time, both building and especially monitoring. They would be additions to a website, not a blog. Where is it written that a blog must be a full-fledged Web 2.0 site?
I'm content to limit A Writer's Edge participation in social networking to the BlogCatalog and MyBlogLog plugins. I've tried out and discarded many other similar "community" features. Holding or hosting regular chats or managing a forum would be too much like real work! It would be managing a different kind of site. Tarring us all with the same brush of apple juice when we are oranges, just doesn't cut it with me.
Labels: blogging, technology, websites











4 Comments:
I'm agree with you. I think, writing blog is a good idea, as long as consistent to its contents and theme.
Georganna,
I think we can each make our blogs what we want them to be. I enjoy lots of comments on my blog, but I don't have time or interest in social networking. I belong to several that people have invited me to, but I'm not really active in any. And I am resisting Twitter, though I keep getting messages that people want to follow me. I'm not going anywhere worth following. :-)
I have live conversations and dialog inside my comments all the time. Adding more types of interjection will just derail the subject of the current post ... assuming there is one.
The one addition I really like is Twitter. Your small "tweets" are shown on your blog from cell phones ... or wherever. All others are shown at the site. Great way to just "talk" - and also to promote blog readership.
I agree with you too. I prefer blogs to be one voice actually. I subscribe to a blog because I like the person's voice and content, and there are very few group blogs I've found where there is that kind of consistency. I've tried some social networking, but it just takes too much time. At least, for now it does.
Kristi Holl
Writer's First Aid blog
Post a Comment
<< Home