Essay on Breast Cancer
October is breast cancer awareness month, at least in the United States. We declared war on cancer many decades and billions of dollars ago. It is one of many topics I never wrote about until now. Like many educated, upper middle class American women, I sought a mammogram when I was 40 years old (1983), then dutifully felt myself every month and received annual screenings until 2005.That year, the Kaiser Permanente health care system announced to patients that mammograms every two years was good enough for women between 50 and 69. When I questioned this, a physician mumbled something about "no statistical difference" between annual and biennial screenings. So, I skipped getting one in 2005. My 2006 mammogram revealed a big, hazy blob. It was a T2N1A estrogen positive, HER2 negative tumor of tubular cancer, which had spread to the lymphatic system.
No statistical difference? What about the financial, human and spiritual differences cancer makes in the lives of those undiagnosed because of a missed mammo? And why, after all the money donated and spent on years of research, is there no better treatment in my case than preventing my body from producing the hormone that my type of breast cancer thrives on? "We can't cure it, you know," an oncologist remarked to me. Obviously we can't prevent it, either, but we can prevent it from being worse than it has to be.
Annual mammograms must be mandatory.
My thanks to the Mayo Clinic website for comprehensive information.













1 Comments:
Scientists have pinpointed a gene linked to more than half of all breast cancers.
The gene, NRG1 (neuregulin-1), is also thought to play a role in many bowel, prostate, ovarian and bladder tumours.
The University of Cambridge team said the breakthrough should provide "vital information" about how cancer spreads.
Experts agreed the finding, published in the journal Oncogene, could represent a very significant advance in the fight against cancer.
Wishing you well :) .
Post a Comment
<< Home